Hello everyone!
I have a Jackson PS3T but I saw a JS32 Warrior and I really like it and I´m considering to sell my PS3T to get the warrior. The thing is that I don´t know much about the quality of my PS3T vs JS32 Warrior. I know that the performer series was an entry level guitar back in the 90s and the JS32 series is the actual entry level but which is best? Thanks!

Well the PS3T was made in Korea and the JS series is produced in India.. The Warrior body is made of Indian Cedro, a type of cedar native to India, and the PS3T is made of alder.. The only real advantage I see to the Warrior is you can play it far more comfortably sitting down.. If possible, see if you can find one at a local dealer so you can actually play one before you decide..

_________________
Chaos, panic, and disorder.. My work is done here.

Thanks for your replay MatreCarrefour!
Yeah, thats what I like it, it is much more comfortable to play while sitting down...
Which wood is better? Alder or Indian Cedro? Is the build quality of the JS series any good?
Thanks again!

Glad to help... Personally, I would take alder over cedar and day.. I have never heard the cedro in person, but where I come from cedar is a building material, not a tone wood...

_________________
Chaos, panic, and disorder.. My work is done here.

I also have a Ps-3t! lol

So i guess Performer series and today's js 32 must be similar in general. The performer wood is better, but the problem of the ps3t is the location of the imput jack, that makes it less confortable. Todays Js 32 (rhoads) have the inpit jack cavity in the higher wing.

The system of the screw of the whammy bar is better in the js32. I also like the warrior a lot, but in my oppinion the rr is confortable to play seated as well.

About the entery level in the 90's, was not really the performers, there were a cheapest model: js 20.