Hi, i gonna buy my first jackson, and and want to know what do u think about this guitar

the WRXT is a great guitar for That money is Bolt on neck and "traditional" ... and passive Duncan Designed ...

Hi, i gonna buy my first jackson, and i want to know what do u think about this guitar

the WRXT is a great guitar for That money is Bolt on neck and "traditional" ... and passive Duncan Designed ...

WRXMG STI and the new ... wihta this "neck through" system ... EMG activity wihta humbukers ...
i dont know if neck That Can handle the tautness of the strings When the floyd is in use ...
That and i think the "neck through" is more .. Than fragile to "bolt on neck" ...

Any pleas know if something or Have experience wiht a "neck through" ...


i play rock, hard rock, metal, trash, and home and kind of heavy music ... Can the WRXMG handle that punishment?
or better go for a WRXT???
thanks, and never really tried a neck thru so please ayudenme jajajaja

Hey any can helpme with that pleas?

WRXT With bolt on neck in maple and alder boddy?
Or
WRXMG With neck Thru in maple and wings in basswood

in the price list the WRXT is more spencive than the WRXMG

thx 4 all

The WRXMG (Including all the new X-series aren't available yet), so not many (if any) have tried them to give you a detailed review or a valid opinion. They're suppose to be available sometimes next month, so I would say hold your horses for a bit until online reviews get uploaded, and better yet until you try one yourself in a store near you.

I suggest you either go for the WRXMG once it's available or save a little bit of money and shoot for the WRMG (or try to find one used in a good condition).
I have one WRXT limited, 2 WRMGs and 2 USA WR1s (one is still being made), and I can definitely tell you that the WRMG is definitely a better guitar than the WRXT.
However, soon I'll be upgrading my LTD Bolted Steel WRXT with a different neck and black hardware to resemble the Bolted Steel WR1, and later I might upgrade its electronics as well.

If the new WRXMGs turned out to be as bad-a$$ as they look, I think that should be your call.
I'm planing to buy two myself once I see and read available reviews. I mean binding, a neck-thru, shark inlays and black hardware with a reversed headstock, what's not to love here?

if you're right ...
have to wait a little longer.
but I still have the big question. neck thru design, to bend over time?
is a good method of construction?
having the "wings" on basswood q will not make the sound "less quality?
the truth is my first neck thru guitar. I've always had guitars screwed.
So the truth is that the neck in one piece "not as the wizard II and III are 3 and 5 pieces" I worry
since you've had several thru neck, you could tell me how good are they?

I like both bolt-ons and neck-throughs, both have a different feel and sound, however the neck-thru construction is more solid and adds to the quality, and arguably sustains better too. Also it's easier and more comfortable to reach those higher notes when soloing.
IMO and from what I've heard, bolt on necks have more tendency to bend with time than neck-throughs. So if you take good care of your guitars, they should last you a life time.

Generally this feature was mostly found on the high-end guitars, so it's great to see it these days available on mid-range to budget guitars as well.
As for the basswood wings on maple neck being a lesser quality, perhaps, but it differs from brand to brand, basswood is a softer wood, so it could ding easily if you aren't careful enough. Sound wise, I think they sound good, unless they utilize low end woods!!!
However, import Jacksons in general have been very well constructed over the years and sound great in most cases, so I won't worry much about it.